Stock trading Essay Example | Topics and Well Written Essays - 500 words

Stock trading - Essay Example Decrease in stock price is a risk which can be offset by getting a put choice that permits the stock to be sold at a particular price and within a certain time. When the price of the stock comes down, the value of the put alternative will raise. The option of stock analysis is resolute by the investors faith in the different prototypes for "how the stock market works". I bought 4,000 PCLN for a price of 82.92 each and paid 25.00 as commission totaling to an amount of 331,705.00 and then when the price of the stock increased to 87 I sold them. Thus I made a profit of 16,270. Similarly I have made profit on GOOG and PBR stocks. This competition has taught me to be careful in what I do. I have learnt some of the technical methods which are useful when trading in stocks and shares. The most important aspect which I came to know is the importance of time frame for the trading to take place. Time frames also teach the alternative of how to get out of a trade. Apart from this I knew that I will have to always keep an eye on the risk factors of trading also. Also I knew that a simple stock trading strategy will help to keep my sanity. Simple trading procedure helped me to carry out my trading strategy efficiently and on a timely basis. The trading competition has also taught me about a new approach to manage my own emotions as a trade. I have also understood how to benefit from the crowd psychology of markets. The three Ms of stock trading also plays a crucial part in the stock market. By three Ms it means Mind, Method and Money. All the three Ms have to be in unison and this is a simple trading strategy which I have learnt from this

Modern Philosophy Final Assignment Example | Topics and Well Written Essays - 2250 words

Modern Philosophy Final - Assignment Example With regard to this question, I at least know with certainty that such things may exist, in as far as they constitute the object of the pure mathematics, since, regarding them in this aspect, I can conceive them clearly and distinctly† (Descartes 111). Descartes comes to know that he gains knowledge of material objects through sense perception, but since sense perception is by nature, deceptive, how can Descartes prove that material objects exist independent of his mind? Herein, he uses the process of elimination to find out what causes his ideas of material bodies, and whether they can exist independent of his mind. In doing so, he first claims that he cannot be the cause of such material bodies, for it would go against his nature and freewill as a thinking substance. The cogito proves only that he exists as a thinking substance, but it does prove anything about his body. In addition, God cannot be the cause either, for these ideas I have of material bodies are mere adventitio us ideas, which are based on sense perception, which are by nature, deceptive. He now knows that God is no deceiver. Therefore, material objects exist insofar as the idea he has of such objects is caused by the objects themselves. As Descartes claims, â€Å"nothing was so likely to occur to my mind as the supposition that the objects were similar to the ideas which they caused† (113). Thus, material objects exist independent of his mind, since its cause must have as much reality to its effect. However, this does not mean that material objects exist as his senses tell them to be. So what then is the true nature of material objects? Herein, Descartes observed a piece of wax and identified its qualities, that is, its color, taste, smell, texture and sound; all of which we come to know through our bodily senses. But when he puts this piece of wax on fire, all those qualities that he observed, changed. Nevertheless, he knows for certain that it is still the same piece of wax, so s omething must have remained so as to consider this wax as the same piece of wax. Thus, Descartes identifies certain primary qualities of the piece of wax, which remain constant, namely: figure, the capacity for change, and spatial extension. These primary qualities are what define the true nature of the piece of wax, and for all material objects and physical substances. What he initially perceived through his senses are mere secondary qualities of the object, which do not belong to the object itself, but are mere sensations and come from within him. In this regard, Descartes is now aware of the distinction between mental and physical substances, that is, mind and matter. According to Descartes, God created these two kinds of substances totally different from one another. Mental substances or the mind, is a thinking thing, has consciousness and is morally responsible for its thoughts. It is not spatially extended and has no capacity for motion, and has free will. On the other hand, p hysical substances or matter, has no consciousness, is subject to mechanical motion, is determined and is spatially extended. These two substances are two mutually exclusive entities, which are independent from each other. In other words, mind cannot be matter and matter cannot be mind. This leads to Descartes’ metaphysical dualism, which claims that there exists a two-fold reality,